Spash, Clive L. 2021. A reply to Levrel and Martinet. Ecological Economics. 179 (Jan), 1-2.
BibTeX
Abstract
Levrel and Martinet (2020; hereafter LM) confuse two separate issues: classification relating to actual groups (their beliefs, motives and ideology) and the implications of a groups' (often paradigmatic) commitments including the implications for ontology, epistemology and methodology. The first concerns the existence of specific identifiable groups, which LM seem to accept even in terms of the validity of the classifications NRE/NEP/SEE. The second concerns how those groups' ideas fit with ideas relating to ecological, as opposed to any other, economics, and including incommensurability and incompatibility between theories, ideas and paradigms.
Tags
Press 'enter' for creating the tagPublication's profile
Status of publication | Published |
---|---|
Affiliation | WU |
Type of publication | Journal article |
Journal | Ecological Economics |
Citation Index | SSCI |
WU Journalrating 2009 | A |
WU-Journal-Rating new | FIN-A, STRAT-B, VW-C, WH-B |
Language | English |
Title | A reply to Levrel and Martinet |
Volume | 179 |
Number | Jan |
Year | 2021 |
Page from | 1 |
Page to | 2 |
Reviewed? | Y |
URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800920307813?via%3Dihub |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106695 |
Open Access | N |
Associations
- People
- Spash, Clive L. (Details)
- Organization
- Institute for Multi-Level Governance and Development IN (Details)