Quotation Hajji, Assma, Trukeschitz, Birgit, Kieninger, Judith, Malley, Juliette, Batchelder, Laurie, Saloniki, Eirini, Burge, Peter, Lu, Hui, Linnosmaa, Ismo, Forder, Julien. 2018. Applying Best-Worst Scaling to Elicit Social Care Related Quality of Life Preferences: The Method and Implications of Taste and Scale Heterogeneity. ILPN 2018, Wien, Österreich, 10.09.-12.09.


RIS


BibTeX

Abstract

Objectives: Studies using best-worst scaling (BWS) have increasingly been used in health economic evaluations for eliciting preferences for health-related states as they are generally seen as less burdensome than discrete choice experiments (DCEs). We present the application of the BWS method for establishing preference weights for the German version of the ASCOT-S (Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit, Service User version). Methods: We conducted a profile-case best-worst experiment with a representative sample of the Austrian population (n=1,000). Utilities for each domain were estimated using a multinomial logit model taking into account the level of the attribute presented. This basic model was then extended to include both additive respondent-level covariates to investigate differences in specific preferences between groups and multiplicative scale factors to account for overall differences in consistency between groups. Results: We found significant positioning effects for ‘best’ choices, with statements at the top being picked more often than those further down in the list. In terms of inter-group preference differences, we find that certain socioeconomic groups (based on age, education, gender) differ significantly in their preferences for certain domains or levels. For consistency of choices, factors related to survey completion (self-assessed understanding of the tasks and survey completion time) were shown to have the greatest effect. Discussion: The findings provide insights into preferences for long-term care outcomes and the workings of BWS experiments. Investigating inter-group differences in taste can help to better understand factors influencing preferences at the personal level, while looking into factors affecting scale heterogeneity provides insight into the decision-making process in the context of the BWS tasks.

Tags

Press 'enter' for creating the tag

Publication's profile

Status of publication Published
Affiliation WU
Type of publication Paper presented at an academic conference or symposium
Language English
Title Applying Best-Worst Scaling to Elicit Social Care Related Quality of Life Preferences: The Method and Implications of Taste and Scale Heterogeneity
Event ILPN 2018
Year 2018
Date 10.09.-12.09.
Country Austria
Location Wien

Associations

Projects
EXCELC - Exploring Comparative Effectiveness and Efficiency in Long-term Care
People
Hajji, Assma (Details)
Trukeschitz, Birgit (Details)
Kieninger, Judith (Details)
External
Batchelder, Laurie (Personal Social Service Research Unit, University of Kent, Rutherford Annexe, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NX, United Kingdom)
Burge, Peter (RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK, United Kingdom)
Forder, Julien (Personal Social Service Research Unit, University of Kent, Rutherford Annexe, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NX, United Kingdom)
Linnosmaa, Ismo (National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Mannerheimintie 166, 00270 Helsinki, Finland , Finland)
Lu, Hui (RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK, United Kingdom)
Malley, Juliette (Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK, United Kingdom)
Saloniki, Eirini (Personal Social Service Research Unit, University of Kent, Rutherford Annexe, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NX, United Kingdom)
Organization
Research Institute for Economics of Aging FI (Details)
Google Scholar: Search