Pistone, Pasquale. 2007. Limitation-on-benefits clauses are clearly different from most-favoured-nation clauses: Test claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation. British Tax Review (4): 363-365.
BibTeX
Tags
Press 'enter' for creating the tagPublication's profile
Status of publication | Published |
---|---|
Affiliation | WU |
Type of publication | Journal article |
Journal | British Tax Review |
WU-Journal-Rating new | FIN-A, STRAT-C, WH-B |
Language | English |
Title | Limitation-on-benefits clauses are clearly different from most-favoured-nation clauses: Test claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation |
Number | 4 |
Year | 2007 |
Page from | 363 |
Page to | 365 |
Reviewed? | Y |
Associations
- Projects
- The Impact of European Law on the Relations with Third Countries
- People
- Pistone, Pasquale (Details)
- Organization
- Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law IN (Details)
- Research areas (Ă–STAT Classification 'Statistik Austria')
- 5206 Financial law (Details)
- 5240 European law (Details)