Pistone, Pasquale. 2007. Limitation-on-benefits clauses are clearly different from most-favoured-nation clauses: Test claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation. British Tax Review (4): 363-365.
BibTeX
Tags
Press 'enter' for creating the tagPublication's profile
| Status of publication | Published |
|---|---|
| Affiliation | WU |
| Type of publication | Journal article |
| Journal | British Tax Review |
| WU-Journal-Rating new | FIN-A, STRAT-C, WH-B |
| Language | English |
| Title | Limitation-on-benefits clauses are clearly different from most-favoured-nation clauses: Test claimants in Class IV of the ACT Group Litigation |
| Number | 4 |
| Year | 2007 |
| Page from | 363 |
| Page to | 365 |
| Reviewed? | Y |
Associations
- Projects
- The Impact of European Law on the Relations with Third Countries
- People
- Pistone, Pasquale (Details)
- Organization
- Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law IN (Details)
- Research areas (ÖSTAT Classification 'Statistik Austria')
- 5206 Financial law (Details)
- 5240 European law (Details)