Quotation Ludwig, Sandra, Fellner-Röhling, Gerlinde, Thoma, Carmen. 2017. Do women have more shame than men? An experiment on self-assessment and the shame of overestimating oneself. European Economic Review. 92 31-46.




We analyze how subjects' self-assessment depends on whether its accuracy is observable to others. We find that women downgrade their self-assessment given observability, while men do not. This holds true when the self-assessment concerns a task with individual as well as competitive incentives. Women avoid the shame they may have if others observe that they overestimated themselves. Men, however, do not seem to be similarly shame averse. This gender difference may be due to different societal expectations: while we find that men are expected to be overconfident, women are not. The negative effect on women's self-assessment is eliminated when performance is only imperfectly observable. Shame aversion may explain recent findings that women shy away from competition, demanding jobs, and wage negotiations, as entering these situations demonstrates confidence in one's ability.


Press 'enter' for creating the tag

Publication's profile

Status of publication Published
Affiliation External
Type of publication Journal article
Journal European Economic Review
Citation Index SSCI
WU Journalrating 2009 A
WU-Journal-Rating new FIN-A, VW-A, WH-B
Language English
Title Do women have more shame than men? An experiment on self-assessment and the shame of overestimating oneself
Volume 92
Year 2017
Page from 31
Page to 46
Reviewed? Y
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.11.007
Open Access N


Fellner-Röhling, Gerlinde (Details)
Ludwig, Sandra (Universität Ulm, Germany)
Thoma, Carmen (Universität München, Germany)
Competence Center for Experimental Research WE (Details)
Department of Economics (Fellner-Röhling) (Details)
Research areas (ÖSTAT Classification 'Statistik Austria')
5335 Political economic theory (Details)
5511 Social psychology (Details)
Google Scholar: Search